As
is the custom, the Friday blog will be a little more random and off-the wall
than usual. Some time back I had some fun creating a system of weights and measures for a fictional environment. I based this system on the human pace and
cubit length and derived a related system of mass and volume measurement.

The
other night I was lying awake in bed and began to wonder about other alternate
systems of measure. Specifically I began to think about directional bearings.

The
system most familiar to many of us is that of degrees, there being 360 degrees
in a circle. One theory is that there are 360 degrees in a circle because the
sun appears to move approximately one degree each day. Another theory is that
six equilateral triangles will make up a full circle. Each segment was then
further divided into 60 by the Babylonians, who liked to do things in 12s and
60s. Incidentally the Russians also had a system based on six triangles but
divided each into 100 to give 600 increments in a circle.

There
didn’t seem to be any particular reason why a culture would select a system
based on 360, 36, 60 or 12. Generally we think of a circle having four cardinal
directions and a circle is easily divided into quarters. Each quarter is one
right angle. The quarters are easily bisected to give us eight equal segments
of a circle, an eighth being half a right angle. The eighths can be bisected
again to give us 16 parts. If we divide the rim of each sixteenth into four
equal parts we have divided the circle into 64.

I
have not been able to find a good word to denote a sixty-forth part. Closest thing
I came across was a “semifusa”, itself a fraction of larger measurement. For
want of a better term I will call a 64^{th} of a circle’s circumference
a “Rey”.

Breaking
the circle up into 64 gives us quite an elegant system. A right angle or
quarter circle is 16/64ths or 16 Rey. Half a right angle or an eighth of a
circle is 8 Rey. Many other useful increments are also nice whole numbers.
Bearings are given in Rey. “Quarter” is a permissible alternate term for right
angles, “eighth” for half right angles. Smaller angles such as sixteenths or
thirty-seconds are instead given in multiples of Rey. One Rey is 5.625 degrees,
a nice sized unit to work with.

The
Rey or 64^{th} can of course be divided further for more accuracy.
Rather than continuing the process of further halving the unit my inclination
was to decimalize fractions of the Rey. Bearings could be expressed as 9.3 Rey,
for example, each tenth of a Rey being a shade over half a degree.

As
I was laying thinking about this system the proverbial penny dropped. 64 parts
of a circle…6400 mils on a military compass! Each Rey is equivalent to 100
mils.

For
those not familiar with the system, I will explain. Many military forces use a
system based on milliradians rather than degrees. A radian is a length of
circumference equal to the radius of the circle. There are therefore 2Ï€ radians
in a circle. More practically this unit is used in milliradians. At 1,000
metres range one “mrad” or “mil” equals one metre of circumference. Looked at
more practically if a man appears to have a width across his shoulders of about
one mil he is about 500 metres away. A 0.1mrad adjustment to gun sights changes
the point of impact 1 cm at 100 m or 3 cm at 300. Mils should not be confused
with MOA or “minutes of arc”. There 21,600 MOA in a circle.

Since
radians fit into a circumference as a multiple of Ï€ the actual number of
milliradians in a circle is approximately 6,283. A right angle in milliradians
is actually Ï€/2 x 1000 mrads, slightly less than 1600 mrads. Military forces
actually use a unit derived from the milliradian called the NATO mil, which is
1/6400^{th} of a circle.

So
my new measuring system had come full circle (pun intended) and differed from
the NATO mil system only by the magnitude of its units.

One right angle
= Quarter of a circle = 90° = 16 Rey = 1600 Nato mils = Ï€/2 (approx. 1.6)
radians.

1
Rey = 1/64^{th} of a circle = 5.625° = 100 NATO mils = approx. 0.1
radians.

The
interesting thing about this little thought experiment is this. Beforehand I
had not paid much attention to NATO mils. A 6400^{th} of a circle was
very difficult to visualize and a bearing such as “5760 mils” would need a
pause for thought to just determine if I should be looking east or west.
Thinking of the compass as being in 64^{ }parts, with each 64^{th}
having a hundred subdivisions actually makes it much easier for me to get a
handle on. I know that 5760 is 57.6/64. Since 48 is three quarters of a circle
and 8 is an eighth I can easily visualize that 5760 is a shade north of
north-west.

Not
only have I gained a better grasp of NATO mils I begin to prefer them over
degrees, multiples and factors of 64 being much easier to handle than those of
360.

Try
this for yourself and see how it works for you.